The common currency that many communications professionals seek is the effect on an audience. This is brand. It is a measure of attitudes, an understanding of reputation amongst key publics or market segments. But why are attitudes important? Because we know from consumer behaviour theory that attitude change must occurs before behaviour can change. And behaviour change is generally what marketers want. Whether its product trial, brand shift, increased usage or brand advocacy. It could even be social change, such as socially responsible drinking. Finally, by knowing where attitudes sit we know more about planning relevant communications. So the steps can be mapped as follows:
- Social (& other) communication activity occurs
- Attitudes are changed in some way
- Brand shifts
- Behaviour changes toward that desired
- Advocacy status shifts
So the question becomes "What was my return on each communications activity?". Over time this can be answered if you are systematic about your tracking. In fact, simply charting the communications activities against brand preference scores can be very revealing. Even better, if you can evaluate acitivites to convert them into outputs like reach and tone of media or blogs and number of people attending events. Building up that collection of metrics creates an asset to improve decisions and prove your results. Also, you then have the option of using more sophisticated statistics. These can show how strongly each activity drove brand or sales. And even what type of content to focus on. For more how-to info see this document.
Imagine how it would change your comms planning if you knew, for example, that the Trust brand attribute drives 22% of your brand preference result! Or that for every $1 you spend on PR you get back $5.50 in Sales but only $2.70 for advertising. There's a compelling value proposition.
